Ethereum and Solana Staking Volumes Rise, Yields Fall in Q3 Amid Institutional Interest
Published
In the third quarter (Q3), both Ethereum and Solana saw increased staking volumes, with Ethereum reaching a new all-time high.
MissedBlock Desk · 3 min read
In the third quarter (Q3), both Ethereum and Solana saw increased staking volumes, with Ethereum reaching a new all-time high. However, this surge in participation coincided with a decrease in annualized staking yields for both major proof-of-stake networks. This trend highlights the dilutive effect of more participants sharing the same reward pool, a dynamic particularly relevant for institutional investors navigating the crypto asset landscape.
Ethereum’s staked volume hit 43.8 million ETH in Q3, representing 35.9% of its total supply. Despite this significant increase in locked capital, the gross annualized staking yield for Ethereum dropped from 2.81% in Q2 to 2.63% in Q3. Similarly, Solana’s gross staking yield decreased from approximately 6.38% in the previous quarter to around 6% in Q3. These figures indicate that while more capital is being committed to securing these networks, the returns on that capital are diminishing.
The decrease in yields, particularly for Ethereum, is partly attributed to the mechanics of staking rewards. According to Bitwise, a substantial portion of Ethereum’s yield, approximately 96.3% or 2.53 percentage points in Q3, originates from new ETH issuance. this may indicate that as more ETH is staked, the existing holders’ proportion of the total supply is diluted unless offset by token burning mechanisms. While Solana also saw a decrease in its validator count from 696 to 659 in Q3, its yield reduction is attributed to an increased staking base and a decrease in issuance, despite growth in on-chain activity and fees.
Despite the declining yields, institutional capital continues to enter the staking market. This suggests a strategic shift among institutional investors, potentially viewing staking as a yield-generating strategy even in a lower-yield environment, or as a means of diversification. However, institutional adoption faces significant challenges, notably liquidity constraints associated with unstaking periods. For instance, while institutions typically require redemption capabilities within one to two days, Ethereum’s unstaking process can take several weeks. This mismatch poses a routine challenge for institutional liquidity planning, as noted by Coinbase.
To address these liquidity concerns, service providers are actively developing solutions. Payward Services, a subsidiary of Kraken’s parent company, is working on providing clients’ staked positions with real-time liquidity. Furthermore, some institutions are adopting strategies such as staking only a portion of their assets or utilizing liquid staking tokens, like stETH, to maintain exposure while bypassing traditional unstaking wait times. WisdomTree’s physical staked Ether ETP is cited as an example of leveraging stETH for both exposure and liquidity.
The trend of increasing staking volumes alongside decreasing yields presents a complex picture for the crypto market. It signals a maturing staking landscape where operational efficiency, security, and liquidity management are becoming paramount for institutional participation. While the allure of staking rewards persists, the economics are evolving, pushing both investors and service providers to innovate in how staked assets are managed and accessed.
Why This Matters
The materials describe a narrow update: In the third quarter, the amount of ETH staked reached a new high of 43. The exact timing and impact of future yield declines for Ethereum and Solana.
Broader Context
Source materials place the factual news in this context: The article references a Bitwise report titled ‘The Bitwise Staking Report, Q3 2026’.
